Central and East European
Society for Phenomenology

Repository | Journal | Volume | Article

142321

Experience and evidence

Nam-In Lee(Seoul National University)

pp. 229-246

Abstract

It is the aim of this paper to assess Levinas's criticism of Husserl's concept of evidence. In Sect. 1, I will summarize Levinas's criticism of Husserl's concept of evidence. In Sect. 2, I will delineate Husserl's concept of experience and in Sect. 3, I will try to define the concept of evidence in Husserl. In Sect. 4–6, I will assess Levinas's criticism of Husserl's concepts of evidence and show that Levinas's criticism of Husserl's concept of evidence is out of the mark, since it is based on a total misunderstanding of Husserl's concepts of evidence.

Publication details

Published in:

(2007) Husserl Studies 23 (3).

Pages: 229-246

DOI: 10.1007/s10743-007-9024-0

Full citation:

Lee Nam-In (2007) „Experience and evidence“. Husserl Studies 23 (3), 229–246.