Repository | Journal | Volume | Article
The twofold role of diagrams in Euclid's plane geometry
pp. 55-102
Abstract
Proposition I.1 is, by far, the most popular example used to justify the thesis that many of Euclid’s geometric arguments are diagram-based. Many scholars have recently articulated this thesis in different ways and argued for it. My purpose is to reformulate it in a quite general way, by describing what I take to be the twofold role that diagrams play in Euclid’s plane geometry (EPG). Euclid’s arguments are object-dependent. They are about geometric objects. Hence, they cannot be diagram-based unless diagrams are supposed to have an appropriate relation with these objects. I take this relation to be a quite peculiar sort of representation. Its peculiarity depends on the two following claims that I shall argue for: (i) The identity conditions of EPG objects are provided by the identity conditions of the diagrams that represent them; (ii) EPG objects inherit some properties and relations from these diagrams.
Publication details
Published in:
Mumma John, Panza Marco, Sandu Paul-Gabriel (2012) Diagrams in mathematics. Synthese 186 (1).
Pages: 55-102
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-012-0074-2
Full citation:
Panza Marco (2012) „The twofold role of diagrams in Euclid's plane geometry“. Synthese 186 (1), 55–102.