Central and East European
Society for Phenomenology

Repository | Book | Chapter

200810

Assessing infinite regress arguments

Michael Huemer

pp. 229-246

Abstract

A common form of argument in philosophy claims that some philosophical thesis, T, generates an infinite regress, whereupon the reader is supposed to see that T must therefore be rejected (see Chapter 2). Such arguments often prove controversial, and the controversy usually centers on whether the infinite regress in question is vicious or benign. In this chapter, I offer an account of when an infinite regress is vicious, which I deploy to assess the six infinite regresses discussed in Chapter 2.

Publication details

Published in:

Huemer Michael (2016) Approaching infinity. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Pages: 229-246

DOI: 10.1057/9781137560872_13

Full citation:

Huemer Michael (2016) Assessing infinite regress arguments, In: Approaching infinity, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 229–246.