Repository | Series | Book | Chapter
Is strong correspondence (theory of truth) possible?
pp. 13-26
Abstract
This is a very pregnant formulation, and its relevance for defining truth is clear: We are free when deciding what the expressions of our language should mean; thereafter, however, when using these expressions to describe the world, we are confronted with the problem of distinguishing between sentences which correspond to facts and those ones which do not, and solving this problem cannot be given by our free decision. (We are not free even in the case that the respective sentences concern mathematical constructions, but here we will turn our attention to the empirical case.)
Publication details
Published in:
Hintikka Jaakko, Czarnecki Tadeusz, Placek Tomasz, Rojszczak Artur (2003) Philosophy and logic in search of the Polish tradition: essays in honour of jan Woleński on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 13-26
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0249-2_2
Full citation:
Materna Pavel (2003) „Is strong correspondence (theory of truth) possible?“, In: J. Hintikka, T. Czarnecki, T. Placek & A. Rojszczak (eds.), Philosophy and logic in search of the Polish tradition, Dordrecht, Springer, 13–26.