Repository | Series | Book | Chapter
Mind vs. body and other false dilemmas of post-cartesian philosophy of mind
pp. 25-39
Abstract
This chapter, after surveying some of the most recalcitrant dilemmas of modern philosophy of mind, argues that we can get rid of them by revising their usually unchecked presumptions from the perspective of a paradigmatically different conceptual framework, namely, scholastic Aristotelian hylomorphism. In particular, the chapter points out that our false presumptions are historically rooted in those late-medieval conceptual developments that first allowed the emergence of the apparent possibility of "Demon-skepticism", which lies at the bottom of the modern idea of identifying the mind as "the self", the seat of consciousness, in stark contrast with the body, an unconscious physical, biological mechanism. As opposed to this conception, the chapter presents the earlier scholastic Aristotelian paradigm, which it dubs "hyper-externalism", as the conceptual framework that rightly excludes the apparent possibility of "Demon-skepticism", the ultimate ground of our false dilemmas listed earlier.
Publication details
Published in:
Garca Valdecasas Miguel (2016) Biology and subjectivity: philosophical contributions to non-reductive neuroscience. Dordrecht, Springer.
Pages: 25-39
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30502-8_3
Full citation:
Klima Gyula (2016) „Mind vs. body and other false dilemmas of post-cartesian philosophy of mind“, In: M. Garca Valdecasas (ed.), Biology and subjectivity, Dordrecht, Springer, 25–39.